To me, it was like it had been wired into my PC all along, which isn't something I can say for the Razer Mamba. It was so fast and easy to use, in fact, that I often forgot I was using a wireless mouse altogether. It's just so light and wonderfully agile, and I decided almost immediately that I never wanted to go back to using a wired mouse ever again. However, when you put those two things inside a mouse that weighs just 80g, it transforms the Pro Wireless into an absolute revelation. The Pro Wireless also has the same Hero 16K sensor as the excellent G502 Hero, too, so it's not like you're getting a mouse that's any faster or has a higher sensitivity range than Logitech's £80 / $80 wired job. The Lightspeed tech is the same stuff you'll find in Logitech's G903 and G603 wireless gaming mice, both of which our Alec enjoyed very much (minus the G603's razor sharp finger spikes, that is) as well as the G305 and G703. And it's quite possibly the best gaming mouse I've ever used.Ī lot of the Pro Wireless' key ingredients aren't actually that new. The ambidextrous Logitech G Pro Wireless on test today, however, goes several steps further - it not only weighs an almost impossibly light 80g, but Logitech's Lightspeed Wireless tech claims it has a lag-free, 1ms report rate connection. Razer's Mamba + Firefly Hyperflux combo managed to get round the latter problem with its featherlight 96g wireless mouse that magically charged itself just by sitting on its mouse mat, but it also cost an arm and a leg. Strides have been made to rectify these challenges, of course. Despite being free of snagging cables that somehow manage to get in the way of everything at all times, that liberty often comes at the cost of latency and reliability, with the extra disadvantage that they've now got to carry a battery round as well as all their various bits of wireless gubbins. One of the biggest complaints often levied at wireless gaming mice is that they're simply too slow and heavy compared to their wired rivals.
0 kommentar(er)
